katy Said: the design is the same., the robe just went the other way (its mirrored)
um wtf fail no its not. lots of differences. for example look at the big flower in the middle, on the dress the lines go down, on the tan they go up. not to mention it’s in a completely different spot.
The pattern is not flipped, it’s upside down. So either it’s pho-shoped, which it could be, or the person on the right got a tan from a diffrent bit of fabric, layed the otherway up.
Personally, because the pattern fails to wrap around the skin where the arms are, I think it is photoshoped OR the cloth was carefully laied over the girl in a sun bed. Either way, she did not get it from waring that garment, or one like it.
I don’t think it’s shopped, the tan does look a bit different but I think that’s just positioning. Look at the dots in the flowers, they’re all connected just like the robe. If someone shopped this and didn’t even get the pattern right I don’t think they would’ve noticed that detail.
Photo shopped, the colors are all wrong, I could have done that in my sleep. If you look on the left side of the image you can see pixellation 2 degrees left of ortstrat. I am amazed at the audacity of this person.
No this is NOT a mirrored picture. It is not even upside down. Look very closely and you will see that the two designs look similar but have many differences (spaces between shapes, the curls etc.). Even the girl’s hair is different colors in each picture.
Either this is PhotoShopped, or they could have used two models where the one who posed with the robe on used a different robe from the one who actually sat out in the sun, or the same girl used a different robe from her original pose and this is her picture after being in the sun.
Photoshopped or not, in theory this is entirely possible. Up here in New Hampshire, it’s common practice for women to put decal stickers on themselves before they go tanning with the end result being a heart shaped tan line wherever they placed it. I’ve seen the playboy bunny logo, stars, crescent moons, all kinds of things. Granted, it’s nowhere near the scale that this thing is, but the theory is sound.
Ok, really? Whether its photoshopped or not, ure talking about the girls hair being different? Have you ever heard of hair dye? as long as she would have had to lay out to get a tan that deep, it had to be months! Lots of fem’s dye their hair every few months! And the shirt? You can tell it was just shifted a bit from it’s original position. If it isn’t shopped, it was most def spray tan cause that is not a natural tan tone.
Anyways, I agree, It’s a neat idea. I actually did that once on my foot, but with self tanner… made a stencil and taped it to my foot, dabbed it on, took the stencil off and let it sit for a while. Very cool.
[…] Lay out in the sun wearing this “robe” and you will get a great tattoo. Although, I guess you would have to be perfectly still and not let the robe shift or crumple at all. If you did, the design may look a lot worse. Found on this site HERE. […]
Anon said: I am a idiot that goes around and says shopped all day while browsing websites…Sorry but you give me little to no hope when it comes to the human race, I am still waiting for evolution to catch up with people like you…
If you think this is shopped, why don’t you appreciate it more as a concept idea…which they are trying to give you a visual aid, which I think it would be better to kick the visual and just give you aids.
Photoshopped or not, in theory this is entirely possible. Up here in New Hampshire, it’s common practice for women to put decal stickers on themselves before they go tanning with the end result being a heart shaped tan line wherever they placed it. I’ve seen the playboy bunny logo, stars, crescent moons, all kinds of things. Granted, it’s nowhere near the scale that this thing is, but the theory is sound.
(Unrealted Note =P: Hi, i also live in NH, theres no girls who do that that i see.) From the idiocy on this page actually makes my brain cells die…the internet has really made ppl to believe that everything that they see is photoshopped, my friend said today that his girlfriends ring was PS’ed. this practice has also been around for a while (10 years give or take).
whoa that’s crazy! cool idea!
That’s one way to do it. I don’t think I could deal with the sunburned butt, though.
[…] Saulės tatuiruotė […]
shopped
yeah. right.
the robe cut out looks nothing like her “tan design”.
the design is the same., the robe just went the other way (its mirrored)
katy Said: the design is the same., the robe just went the other way (its mirrored)
um wtf fail no its not. lots of differences. for example look at the big flower in the middle, on the dress the lines go down, on the tan they go up. not to mention it’s in a completely different spot.
The pattern is not flipped, it’s upside down. So either it’s pho-shoped, which it could be, or the person on the right got a tan from a diffrent bit of fabric, layed the otherway up.
Personally, because the pattern fails to wrap around the skin where the arms are, I think it is photoshoped OR the cloth was carefully laied over the girl in a sun bed. Either way, she did not get it from waring that garment, or one like it.
First pic she’s merely modeling the coat, I doubt she was stood in that one position when tanning, it’ll have been on tighter.
when the page first loaded i thought she had some kind of skin disease
Wow -goes to closet with scissors- Roll on summer!
The “shirt” is not accyrate with her tanning….wth???
I don’t think it’s shopped, the tan does look a bit different but I think that’s just positioning. Look at the dots in the flowers, they’re all connected just like the robe. If someone shopped this and didn’t even get the pattern right I don’t think they would’ve noticed that detail.
Regardless of whether it’s ’shopped or not, it’s a very cool idea. At least for those not too susceptible to burning.
Photo shopped, the colors are all wrong, I could have done that in my sleep. If you look on the left side of the image you can see pixellation 2 degrees left of ortstrat. I am amazed at the audacity of this person.
How childish!!!
photoshopped
No this is NOT a mirrored picture. It is not even upside down. Look very closely and you will see that the two designs look similar but have many differences (spaces between shapes, the curls etc.). Even the girl’s hair is different colors in each picture.
Either this is PhotoShopped, or they could have used two models where the one who posed with the robe on used a different robe from the one who actually sat out in the sun, or the same girl used a different robe from her original pose and this is her picture after being in the sun.
Photoshopped or not, in theory this is entirely possible. Up here in New Hampshire, it’s common practice for women to put decal stickers on themselves before they go tanning with the end result being a heart shaped tan line wherever they placed it. I’ve seen the playboy bunny logo, stars, crescent moons, all kinds of things. Granted, it’s nowhere near the scale that this thing is, but the theory is sound.
Ok, really? Whether its photoshopped or not, ure talking about the girls hair being different? Have you ever heard of hair dye? as long as she would have had to lay out to get a tan that deep, it had to be months! Lots of fem’s dye their hair every few months! And the shirt? You can tell it was just shifted a bit from it’s original position. If it isn’t shopped, it was most def spray tan cause that is not a natural tan tone.
Anyways, I agree, It’s a neat idea. I actually did that once on my foot, but with self tanner… made a stencil and taped it to my foot, dabbed it on, took the stencil off and let it sit for a while. Very cool.
[…] Lay out in the sun wearing this “robe” and you will get a great tattoo. Although, I guess you would have to be perfectly still and not let the robe shift or crumple at all. If you did, the design may look a lot worse. Found on this site HERE. […]
Not the same design and it looks like it was sprayed on over a template of some sort…not the result of tanning.
wow thats effing amazing, i wonder how long u gotta bathe in the sun to get a good effect
nice, very creative and unique art!
ya ill work a lot better with sunless tanning solution lol
It’s not the same girl. The one on the left has a higher
butt crack.
Anon said: I am a idiot that goes around and says shopped all day while browsing websites…Sorry but you give me little to no hope when it comes to the human race, I am still waiting for evolution to catch up with people like you…
If you think this is shopped, why don’t you appreciate it more as a concept idea…which they are trying to give you a visual aid, which I think it would be better to kick the visual and just give you aids.
Cancer!
Cancer!
Wow skin cancer is now in style!…
that’s not a suntan! that’s henna. cute idea though.
Photoshopped or not, in theory this is entirely possible. Up here in New Hampshire, it’s common practice for women to put decal stickers on themselves before they go tanning with the end result being a heart shaped tan line wherever they placed it. I’ve seen the playboy bunny logo, stars, crescent moons, all kinds of things. Granted, it’s nowhere near the scale that this thing is, but the theory is sound.
(Unrealted Note =P: Hi, i also live in NH, theres no girls who do that that i see.) From the idiocy on this page actually makes my brain cells die…the internet has really made ppl to believe that everything that they see is photoshopped, my friend said today that his girlfriends ring was PS’ed. this practice has also been around for a while (10 years give or take).